- 註冊時間
- 2014-10-16
- 最後登錄
- 2017-7-28
- 閱讀權限
- 70
- 積分
- 2074
- 精華
- 0
- 帖子
- 659
|
本帖最後由 吳岩鷲 於 2015-1-9 10:31 編輯
蒙冤受屈 患難與共01 P29
平反。Vindicated.
習書記secretary
個人榮辱Personal honor
置之度外,Indifferent,
時時Constantly
牽掛著戰友、Worried about his comrades,
同志的冤情。Comrade grievances.
他在處置繁忙He was busy at the disposal
政務的同時,接待了很多受害者及其家屬,親自過問 一大批受“習仲勳反黨集團Meanwhile government, received a lot of victims and their families, personally attended by a large number of "anti-party group Xi
案”牽連的冤案,為他們平反昭雪。Case "implicated injustice, rehabilitates them.
黨的Party
十一屆三中全會後,After the Third Plenum of the Eleventh,
從中央到地方From central to local
都加快了平反冤假錯案的工作。Have accelerated the vindication of miscarriages of justice work.
根據鄧小平同志的指示,According to Deng Xiaoping's instructions,
中央組織部對小說劉志丹一 案進行了複查。Central Organization Department of the novel Liu Chih-tan case were reviewed.
1979年7月14日,July 14, 1979,
中央組織部Central Organization Department
向中央上報了Had reported to the central
《關 於為小說《劉志丹》平反的報告》。"Regarding the novel" Liu Chih-tan, "the report vindicated."
報告指“《劉志丹》Reports that "" Liu Chih-tan "
(送審樣書)(Submittals kind of book)
不是反黨小說,Not a novel anti-Party,
一部比較好的歌頌A relatively good praise
老一輩Old generation
無產階級革命家、Proletarian revolutionary,
描寫革命鬥爭歷史的小說。Describing the history of the revolutionary struggle of the novel.
習仲勳等同志關心這部小說的創作,Comrade Xi and other concerned the creation of the novel,
對如何改好這部小說發表過意見,How to change a good novel commented,
是完全正當的,Is completely justified,
根本談不上Not to mention
是什麼反黨陰謀集團活動。What is anti-party activities cabal.
”“所謂利用"" The so-called use
寫《劉志丹》小說Write "Liu Chih-tan" fiction
進行反黨活動— 案,Conduct anti-party activities - case
是康生製造的一起大錯案。Kang Sheng is a great wrong case made together.
“文化大革命”中,"Cultural Revolution",
康生Kang Sheng
夥同Together
林彪、Lin Biao,
“四人幫”,"Gang of Four"
更是變本加厲地Is intensified to
搞出一起株連甚廣的Come together to implicate very wide
現代文字獄。”
Modern Inquisition. "
報告建議:The report recommends:
“因《劉志丹》小說案件受到誣陷的同志,
"Because," Liu Chih-tan "novels cases framed by comrades
一律
昭雪平反。Zhao Xueping reversed.
錯誤的結論Wrong conclusions
處理一律撤銷,Processing will be revoked,
有關的檢查、For the inspection,
交待一律從干部檔案中撤出銷毀。”Will be withdrawn from the account of the destruction of cadre archives. "
“報刊上"Newspapers on
可適Be suitable
當發表一些評論文章,When a few comments on articles,
澄清被 康生和林彪、Clarification by Kang Sheng and Lin Biao,
“四人幫”"Gang of Four"
在這一案件中In this case
搞亂了的Messing up the
思想、Thinking,
理論、Theory,
路線是非,Line wrong,
恢復黨的傳統作風,Restore the party's traditional style,
更好地調整黨的文藝政策,Better adjust the party's arts policy,
貫徹“Implement "
百花齊放、Flourishing,
百家爭鳴
”方針,促進"Policy, promote
社會主義Socialism
文藝的繁榮Literary boom
8月4日,
中共Chinese Communist Party
中央Central
向全黨批轉了Forwarded to the whole party
這一報告。This report.
為了進一步消除To further eliminate
這一案件在
陝西等地的惡劣影響,Shaanxi bad influence,
1980年1月 11日,
中央組織部Central Organization Department
轉發了
經中央批覆By the central Pifu
同意的
中共陝西省委CPC Shaanxi Provincial Committee
《關於為 所謂
“彭、高、習“Peng, gao, xi
反黨集團”Anti-party group "
問題徹底平反的請示報告》。
報告 Report
指出“所謂“
彭、高、習Peng, gao, xi
反黨集團”的Anti-Party Group
提法
,是極其荒謬的,Ridiculous
純係 誣衊不實之詞,Slander untruths
由此而造成很多冤假錯案,Miscarriages of justice
打擊
和株連了大批幹部和群眾,Implicate a large number of cadres and the masses
對陝西工作的損害和影響是很嚴重的,Shaanxi damage and impact of the work is a very serious
教訓是很沉痛的。” Is a very painful lesson
報告建議;The report recommends;
“對所謂“The so-called"
彭、高、習Peng, gao, xi
反黨集團”Anti-party group "
的提法一概推倒。”“
因所謂“Due to the so-called "
彭、高、習Peng, gao, xi
反黨集團”問題,Anti-party group "problem,
被打成“Was labeled
反黨文藝”Anti-Party Literature " |
|