設為首頁收藏本站|簡體中文

天羅地網

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動
查看: 2972|回復: 6
打印 上一主題 下一主題

【歷史】柏林圍牆倒下25年 德變歐巨人

[複製鏈接]

88

主題

1

好友

1855

積分

金牌會員

Rank: 6Rank: 6

跳轉到指定樓層
樓主
發表於 2014-11-2 16:56:55 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽
本帖最後由 man6552000 於 2014-11-9 23:23 編輯

蒙古1990年革命簡史
中文翻譯.
http://www.360doc.com/content/13/1201/15/175820_333642256.shtml

原文:
http://nvdatabase.swarthmore.edu ... democracy-1989-1990
In 1921 the Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party (MPRP) came to power and soon aligned the country with the USSR. Until this democracy campaign in 1989, the MPRP ruled Mongolia through a constitutionally-sanctioned single-party government. By the mid-1980’s, pro-reform sentiments and movements were spreading in Eastern Europe, especially at the universities. However, Mongolians remained isolated from all of this except for the few students who could afford to study abroad in Eastern Europe. Although Jambyn Batmunkh, who came to power following a 1984 coup, enacted very limited reforms and a large part of the party had become more sympathetic to reforms, no significant reforms had been made. Nonetheless, by 1989, students had begun organizing underground meetings and secretly putting up posters that protested the ruling party’s monopoly on power.

On December 10, 1989—by no accident concurrent with International Human Rights Day—the opposition group that would soon become the Mongolian Democratic Union (MDU) held its first open demonstration in Sukhbaatar Square with 200 people in attendance. Although opposition groups had held clandestine meetings for the past few years, and had posted placards calling for democracy around Ulan Bator, they had never done so openly, let alone in the same square that housed the Khural—or parliament—and where the MPRP held their many pro-regime rallies and celebrations.

The demands at this initial rally were small compared to what they would become, with demonstrators holding signs calling for openness, the honoring of human rights, and freedom of the press. The speeches of opposition that day were also accompanied by music from the rock group Khonkh.
After the December 10 demonstration the campaigners officially formed the MDU and began to hold meetings, drawing more and more supporters every day. Meanwhile the MPRP Politburo was already showing initial signs of reform by expressing their support of openness and restructuring, although they did not officially instate these policies.

On December 17, the MDU held another rally at Sukhbaatar Square, this time attended by 2,000 people, ten times the number at the first demonstration. Having developed greater support and better organization, the group presented the Politburo with a petition of specific goals. In particular, they called for free, multi-party elections and a market economy to replace the failed, centrally planned economy. They continued their demands for basic human rights, openness, and freedom of the press.

As the MDU held regular demonstrations in Sukhbaatar Square throughout December, the support for the movement continued to grow and to incorporate a membership that was more representative of the Mongolian population. MDU representatives recruited mineworkers in the city of Erdenet, who were spurred by their disdain for the Soviet control of the mine. This same anti-Soviet inclination was beginning to emerge in the movement as a whole.
On January 14, the MDU held a meeting of 1,000 people in the Lenin Museum in Ulan Bator. This was part of a series of meetings for open discussion that expressed the possibility of true democracy in Mongolian society. Later in the month, continuing to weaken the MPRP’s hold on the population, the MDU gained the support of the Mongolian Journalists’ Union—which was then renamed the Mongolian Democratic Journalists’ Union—representing a possible shift towards free press.

On January 21, which was a day normally celebrated by communist governments to commemorate Lenin, the MDU’s new coordinating committee organized another huge rally. Thousands of supporters joined this rally, celebrating Mongolian nationalism and culture instead of the communist hero. Rather than singing the MPRP songs that normally resounded in Sukhbaatar Square, the protesters—which now represented Mongolians from rural areas, small towns, large cities, and all classes—sang traditional Mongolian folk songs honoring the Mongolian conqueror, Genghis Khan.
Throughout January and February the Mongolian Politburo was unable to reach a solution for ending the emergent popular protest. They knew that violent repression would be looked down upon by the USSR, especially after the frenzy around the repression at Tienanmen Square in China. And yet, every day the MPRP government was losing legitimacy.

In mid-February, as an affront to the constitutionally sanctioned single-party rule, leaders of the MDU formed several new political parties, including the Mongolian Democratic Party and the National Progressive Party. Additionally, the MPRP control of the media was loosening further as opposition journalists began to publish newspapers without governmental approval. Protesters, having gained popular approval from Mongolian nationalists, dismantled the statue of Stalin that sat before the Mongolian National Library on February 22.

In another hugely symbolic action, ten MDU members, who were dressed in outlawed traditional clothing, launched a hunger strike in Sukhbaatar Square on March 7, 1990. The hunger strike was new to Mongolia and was greeted with some curiosity, but paired with the traditional clothing it became a national symbol. Throughout the day supporters gathered and marched in the square, students stopped schoolwork, and Buddhist monks came to show their support for the hunger strikers. In towns throughout Mongolia, including Erdenet, workers held short sympathy strikes in conjunction with the actions in central Sukhbaatar Square.

The still divided Politburo attempted to negotiate an end to the hunger strike that day, still hopeful to avoid any violent repression. The hunger strikers, however, claimed that they would not stop until their demands were met. Support for the strikers and their demands continued to grow throughout the day.
With so many people now in support of the democratic movement, the MDU began to lose some control over the crowd. On the second day of the hunger strike some protesters stole cars and buses and drove throughout Ulan Bator yelling anti-Soviet and anti-MPRP slogans. In several instances campaigners even used violence and vandalism, despite the leadership’s continued advocacy for nonviolence. Nonetheless, the Politburo continued to refuse the use of forceful repression for fear of its negative effects.

On March 9, confronted by the widespread support for the hunger strikers and the ensuing chaos, the entire Politburo announced its resignation. This allowed the Mongolian parliament to put forth new governmental reforms and new MPRP leadership. The parliament held meetings with MDU members and representatives from newly formed civil groups throughout the country in the following days, and after several days the parliament also officially ended constitutional support for single-party rule and elected a new Politburo made up of younger, reform-minded members. Meanwhile, the MDU continued to hold rallies. Because of their continued actions, when police finally arrested protesters for the first time in early April, the MDU was ready to contest the arrests with a second hunger strike that eventually succeeded in freeing the imprisoned campaigners. By the end of April the number of people attending rallies had surpassed 40,000, several opposition parties had held their first congresses, and the parliament continued to reform the MPRP government.

Finally, on May 10, 1990, the parliament declared that free, multi-party elections would be held in July. Although the Communist Party did in fact win nearly ¾ of the seats in that election, hardliners were replaced by reformists in the party. Mongolia’s time as a single-party, Communist dictatorship had come to an end. In 1996 the Communists lost their majority in the government.

轉貼自高登link, 內有雲海 youtube link 簡短講述.
http://forum7.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?type=CA&message=5477495
回復

使用道具 舉報

88

主題

1

好友

1855

積分

金牌會員

Rank: 6Rank: 6

沙發
發表於 2014-11-9 12:56:43 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 man6552000 於 2014-11-9 12:57 編輯

柏林圍牆倒下25年
德變歐巨人


http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/in ... t/20141109/18929018

今天(周日)是柏林圍牆倒下25周年,德國前天展開一連三日紀念活動,慶祝當年東德民眾推倒圍牆奔向自由、擺脫蘇聯宰制,觸發德國統一和蘇聯東歐共產主義集團崩潰。當年群眾也許想不到,他們一鼓作氣推倒圍牆,會成就德國今時今日成為歐洲的經濟和政治中心。

三日紀念活動以「爭取自由的勇氣」為主題,總理默克爾(Angela Merkel)憶述當年35歲在東德的見聞,指民眾突破圍牆之時,她剛洗完桑拿浴,聽到消息後只見人們湧到邊界,「我永不忘記那一天,這自由的感覺。我等了35年,這改變了我一生」。

奔向自由 成政經中心
默克爾當日只想到自由,時任英國首相戴卓爾夫人(Margaret Thatcher)據報卻很有遠見地說:「我們(在兩次大戰)打敗德國人兩次,現在他們捲土重來了。」

圍牆倒下1/4世紀後,德國經濟穩步增長,成為歐盟中無可置疑的巨人,獨佔歐元區27%經濟產出,希臘等「歐豬國家」債務危機都要德國出手救助,執行默克爾要求的緊縮政策;烏克蘭出現危機,歐洲也是以默克爾出面跟俄羅斯周旋。
布魯塞爾歐洲政策研究中心總監蘭諾說:「圍牆倒下前,德國可說是在歐洲邊陲,現在無論地理上、經濟上和政治上,德國都是歐洲的中心。它是歐洲的龍頭,我們可見金融危機時歐洲最重要的地方是柏林,不是布魯塞爾。」不過他亦指德國不太願意在世界舞台展示領導力,經濟遠景亦受人口減少影響,主導歐洲恐不長久。
捲土重來的除了德國,還有俄羅斯。俄羅斯與西方爭奪烏克蘭引起的衝突,令柏林1/4世紀來首次在冷戰重臨陰影下紀念圍牆倒下。

戈爾巴喬夫訪查理檢查站
當年下令東德當局切勿血腥鎮壓示威者的蘇聯領導人戈爾巴喬夫(Mikhail Gorbachev),前天造訪柏林分治時期地標查理檢查站時,說對自己的歷史角色感到自豪,但亦警告勿讓烏克蘭危機引發的東西方緊張擴大,指德俄維持良好關係很重要。
美國總統奧巴馬前天發祝賀聲明時,亦指「俄羅斯在烏克蘭的所作所為,提醒我們要做多些工夫,去實現一個完整、自由、和平的歐洲願景」。他指「無論歐洲或其他地方,凡有公民尋求自決命運,我們都會受柏林的經驗指引」。
不過對德國人來說,這三日仍值得慶賀。慶祝活動前天黃昏由亮燈展開,155公里長圍牆的其中一段15公里長遺址,近8,000個附燈的氦氣球亮起,沿途並設100塊告示板,讓前東德人分享共黨統治時期故事。
默克爾昨天會出席一個紀念音樂會,今天主持柏林圍牆紀念館的大型展覽開幕禮,以及御林廣場的紀念儀式,晚上跟多名當年東歐政要和預計超過200萬民眾,在勃蘭登堡門慶祝,屆時將大放煙花和在貝多芬《歡樂頌》合唱演奏聲中,將8,000個發光氦氣球升空。
法新社/德新社

柏林圍牆大事記
13/08/1961 柏林圍牆始建,全長155公里,阻東德人投奔西方,歷來有逾100人嘗試越牆而死
06/10/1989 東德共產政權成立40周年出現大規模示威,東德在蘇聯領導人戈爾巴喬夫警告勿阻改革後,沒有大力鎮壓
18/10/1989 昂納克辭東德共黨總書記一職,之後輾轉由改革派上台
04/11/1989 東德全國示威,東柏林逾100萬人要求政改和自由
09/11/1989 東德當局在誤會中打開了柏林圍牆關卡,民眾趁機推倒圍牆
18/03/1990 東德首次自由選舉,主張急統人士大勝
03/10/1990 德國統一
法新社  
回復

使用道具 舉報

88

主題

1

好友

1855

積分

金牌會員

Rank: 6Rank: 6

板凳
發表於 2014-11-9 12:58:54 |只看該作者
德東經濟大躍進
誕奇蹟小鎮


http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20141109/18929020

德國統一後,首位總理科爾(Helmut Kohl)承諾過會為經濟滯後的東部帶來「繁盛景象」。圍牆倒下25年,德東跟德西的經濟差距收窄了多少?
半杯水是半空還是半滿,不同角度有不同解讀,德東經濟亦一樣。雖然以失業率而言,德東的9.7%仍較德西的5.9%為高,不過從人均國內生產總值計,德東人是德西人的2/3,跟1991年的1/3相比是大躍進。
統一後德東積極實行工業化,現時每年人均工業收入3,400歐元(32,826港元),超越英法,松訥貝格鎮(Sonneberg)是成功例子。這個昔日玩具重鎮,高峯期生產全球1/5玩具,德國統一後當地大搞基建、興建五個工業村,吸引約100家企業湧來設廠,令經濟產量增加逾四倍、失業率由1997年的近13%,跌至德東地區最低的3.5%。松訥貝格實現了經濟奇蹟,難怪市長對前景充滿信心,認為科爾口中的「繁榮景象」近在咫尺。

東德小姐搞時裝生意
德東民眾亦積極過新生。圍牆倒下後,當年僅19歲的科夫卡(Leticia Koffke)沒有即時投奔自由,選擇留下來並參加首屆、亦是唯一一屆東德小姐選舉,摘下后冠,之後到過米蘭、紐約、土耳其當模特兒及搞時裝生意,最終厭倦只顧掙錢的從商生涯,選擇轉行做銷售經理,現在視德西科隆為家。
路透社/德新社  
回復

使用道具 舉報

88

主題

1

好友

1855

積分

金牌會員

Rank: 6Rank: 6

地板
發表於 2014-11-9 12:59:50 |只看該作者
下令開閘軍官
歸功東德群眾


http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20141109/18929022

在歷史書上,耶格(Harald Jaeger)是開放柏林圍牆的關鍵人物──在群情洶湧下,未獲上級清晰指示的他,自行下令開放關卡。但他謙說:「打開圍牆的人不是我,而是那天晚上聚集起來的東德群眾。」
雖然已是25年前的舊事,但71歲的耶格對於1989年11月9日那一夜仍然記得清楚。
官至中校的他,當年是博恩霍爾默街檢查站副主管。那天傍晚他接班後,突然聽到電視傳來官員宣佈「即時開放邊境」。他記得當時嚇一大跳。「我幾乎鯁到了,沒法相信耳朵。那是甚麼蠢話?」
耶格立即致電上級請示,上司說沒有指令,但聽到宣佈而湧到檢查站的人越來越多,有人高呼:「讓我們走!」耶格之後兩度致電上司,第二次在9時後,當時站外已擠得水洩不通,上司着他讓為首那數人出境。結果群眾見狀更激動。
耶格很擔心發生人踩人。「我跟自己說:你得行動。無論結果如何,你都要讓東德人越過邊境。」11時半左右,他發出歷史性的命令:「開閘!」下屬通通呆住了,結果他要把話再說一次。
「唯一功勞是沒流一滴血」
「群眾那股狂喜,我之前從未見過,之後也再沒遇過。」但耶格不肯居功,說:「我唯一的功勞是,整件事沒流一滴血。」
法新社  
回復

使用道具 舉報

88

主題

1

好友

1855

積分

金牌會員

Rank: 6Rank: 6

5#
發表於 2014-11-9 13:00:38 |只看該作者
遺牆遍全球
爭自由象徵


http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20141109/18929025

德國人當初推倒柏林圍牆時,一股腦地要將這專制象徵敲爛、從記憶中抹走,到市政府十多年後醒覺要保留圍牆作歷史文物,圍牆遺蹟已所餘無幾。有前蘇聯領導人布里茲湼夫(Leonid Brezhnev)和東德末代領導人昂納克(Erich Honecker)擁吻塗鴉的一段1.3公里圍牆,是現存最長一段。
現時不少遺牆分佈世界各地,在紐約聯合國總部、加州列根總統圖書館、荷李活、歐洲人權法院、首爾以至東加等地豎立,作為爭取自由的象徵。
德國人對這段歷史的厭惡,亦令很多東德時期文物外流。洛杉磯文德博物館(Wende Musuem)藏品中,連其他東歐文物,就有四個儲存庫之多,包括昂納克的私人文件、東德間諜用品、秘密警察竊聽錄音帶等。德國人近年才想起搞東德主題旅遊,有人要求將昂納克在柏林附近森林的防核地堡轉成博物館。
法新社/德新社/路透社  
回復

使用道具 舉報

88

主題

1

好友

1855

積分

金牌會員

Rank: 6Rank: 6

6#
發表於 2014-11-9 13:01:23 |只看該作者
逾半青年懶理分裂歷史

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/international/art/20141109/18929027

東西德分裂是德國史上其中一項頭號大事,但當地逾半青年對這段國家歷史不感興趣,認為跟現時沒甚麼關係,又指德國人應該着眼未來。
德國調查機構Infratest dimap早前訪問1,015人,發現54%德西地區受訪者沒有興趣進一步認識兩德分裂的歷史,51%德東民眾都持同樣看法,只有不足40%人表示有興趣。
大部份受訪者年齡為14至29歲的青年,在1989年柏林圍牆倒下時仍未出生。難怪多達60%人認為東德屬於過去,德國人應將注意力放在未來。約45%直言學習東德歷史對現時沒有甚麼幫助,態度功利。
不過,81%受訪者認為學校及政治教育已深入教導兩德分裂課題,其中13%東部民眾聲稱精通東德歷史,比率遠高於西部民眾的7%。
德新社  
回復

使用道具 舉報

88

主題

1

好友

1855

積分

金牌會員

Rank: 6Rank: 6

7#
發表於 2014-11-9 13:18:08 |只看該作者
轉自高登

前捷克共產黨國安局長:我曾拒絕鎮壓示威民眾
http://forum1.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?type=CA&message=5488873

【大紀元2014年11月07日訊】(大紀元記者李天韻編譯報導)11月6日,原捷克斯洛伐克國家安全局最後一任局長洛倫克(Alojz Lorenc)在斯洛伐克首都布拉迪斯拉發表示,1989年11月17日,在捷克斯洛伐克首都布拉格爆發超過十萬人的抗議遊行,要求結束共產黨統治時,他曾頂住壓力,公開反對鎮壓示威民眾。

據《捷克新聞》(NOVINKY.cz)11月6日報導,洛倫克將軍在上個世紀80年代後期是捷克斯洛伐克內務部第一副部長、國安局局長,主管特勤局。

11月6日,他對記者說,1989年「天鵝絨」革命時,面對數十萬人的反共遊行,他曾經頂著政界和內政部的壓力,拒絕了特勤局干涉民眾的抗議。 他說:「我在1989年11月17日不同意鎮壓抗議民眾,這是大家都知道的。」他表示,當時面對來自於政界和隸屬於內政部各部門的直接問詢和壓力,他的答覆都是「不干涉」。

他隨後向那些曾經受到國家安全部迫害的人們表示歉意。

他說:「我當然不願意故意傷害任何人,如果是由於我的錯誤決定或我的職務頭銜導致你們受到傷害,在此我向你們道歉,請求你們的原諒。」

對於共產主義,布拉格前市長斯沃博達(Bohuslav Svoboda)曾表示,共產主義的理念聽起來很好聽,但是只要是共產政權掌控的地區,這種思想就變成了殺戮和酷刑的工具,全世界任何一個「共產主義」氾濫的地區都無法逃脫這種厄運。

他說:「不論現在還是將來,那些實行共產黨意識形態的國家,都不會致力於使公民受益。」

http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/14/ ... B0%91%E7%9C%BE.html
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

Archiver|手機版|天羅地網

GMT+8, 2024-11-25 02:59 , Processed in 0.023228 second(s), 19 queries .

回頂部